[DRAFT] Support 320x240 screen sizes and ili9341 displays #597
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Still seems a bit off (overshoots the horizontal center to the right), but close enough.
|
I need to get all the required hardware for this so I can either assemble before or during TABConf. |
|
Most of the st7789 and ili9341 dev boards seem to be the same (even down to the order of their pins). This is the ili9341 I've been working off of: Other useful bits: I'm using 1.) to seat the existing Waveshare display hat and just wire out the joystick and KEY1-3 lines to 2.) which also has the connections to the ili9341. And then 2.) connects to a Pi Zero via ribbon cable.
|
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Description
WORK IN PROGRESS!!
DisplayDriverclass to hide away details specific to ST7789, ILI9341, and (eventually?) ILI9486.This pull request is categorized as a:
Checklist
pytestand made sure all unit tests pass before sumbitting the PRIf you modified or added functionality/workflow, did you add new unit tests?
I have tested this PR on the following platforms/os: